Alaska Mining Claims Map
Alaska is the one state where researching a prospecting location means checking two separate claim systems. The Bureau of Land Management administers federal mining claims on eligible public land, while the Alaska Department of Natural Resources administers mineral-property rights — including mining claims — on state land. Staked Maps already combines both into one Alaska map, so you're not cross-referencing two different agency websites before you head out.
As of September 22, 2026, Staked Maps shows 49,752 current federal and state claim records and 199,386 historical records for Alaska, plus 11,063 documented mineral-occurrence records. A gap between mapped claims isn't by itself proof that a spot is open to stake or prospect — land status, access and authorization still have to be checked separately, covered further down this page.
Free account · No credit card required · Opens directly to the Alaska map
49,752
Current Alaska Claim & Site Records
199,386
Historical Claim Records
11,063
Documented Mineral Occurrences
Mining claim data synchronized: . Federal BLM and Alaska DNR claim records synchronize on a regular schedule, not live with every visit.
If you're planning to prospect in Alaska, there's one thing to sort out before anything else: is the ground you're interested in under federal jurisdiction, state jurisdiction, or something else entirely? The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) administers federal unpatented mining claims on eligible federal public land. The Alaska Department of Natural Resources (DNR), through its Mineral Property Management section, administers mineral-property rights on state land — including state mining claims, leasehold locations and prospecting sites. These are two separate legal systems with two separate sets of records, and Staked Maps brings both onto a single map.
They aren't interchangeable, and a claim in one system tells you nothing about the other. A blank spot on the federal layer over land that's actually state-owned isn't “unclaimed” — it just means you're looking at the wrong dataset. Checking both is the first real step in researching any Alaska location, not an optional extra.
| Source | Current Records | Historical Records |
|---|---|---|
| BLM federal | 9,517 | 119,894 |
| Alaska DNR state | 40,235 | 79,492 |
| Combined | 49,752 | 199,386 |
Combined statewide totals include both federal and state records. Detailed claim-type and status charts further down this page use BLM federal data only, because Alaska DNR records don't use the same classification system — forcing them into BLM's categories would create a comparison that looks tidy but isn't accurate. More on that distinction below.
Reading the numbers above is a start. Seeing where those claims actually sit relative to the ground you're interested in is what makes the research usable.
See both systems at once. View current BLM federal claims and Alaska DNR state claims on the same map instead of checking two separate agency sites.
Layer in historical activity. Add closed and historical claim records to understand what's been worked before.
Take it with you. Paid plans add offline map downloads, built for the parts of Alaska where you won't have cell service.
Free account · No credit card required · Opens directly to Alaska
People searching for “abandoned gold claims in Alaska” are usually looking for one of a few things: closed claims, historical mining activity, previously claimed ground, or areas with a documented history of mining. Neither BLM nor Alaska DNR uses “abandoned” as an official status — BLM's federal records use a closed/historical designation, and Alaska DNR's state records track active and closed status separately.
A historical or closed mining claim is a research lead. It doesn't, on its own, establish that the land is currently available for mineral entry, accessible to the public, or legally open for prospecting or staking. A closed claim tells you someone worked that ground before, which can be useful context. It doesn't tell you the current land status, who currently holds any mineral rights there, or whether the surface is even reachable.
Staked Maps currently shows 199,386 historical claim records for Alaska, combining BLM's closed federal claims with Alaska DNR's closed state claims. If a location interests you because of its history, treat that as a starting point for further research — checking current land status, ownership and access — not as an answer by itself.
7,446
Lode Claims
1,845
Placer Claims
223
Mill Site Claims
3
Tunnel Site Claims
Lode and placer records describe different forms of mineral location; mill sites and tunnel sites are separate location types under the Mining Law, not a third mineral-claim category. The mix is useful for understanding the character of recorded activity, but it doesn't determine whether surrounding land is open to new claim location.
Reflects BLM federal claims only — Alaska DNR's state mining-claim records aren't classified by claim type the same way.
| Claim Type | Current Claims |
|---|---|
| Lode Claims | 7,446 (78.2%) |
| Placer Claims | 1,845 (19.4%) |
| Mill Site Claims | 223 (2.3%) |
| Tunnel Site Claims | 3 (<0.1%) |
Alaska DNR's state mining claims use their own status vocabulary and aren't included in this breakdown — see the two-system comparison above for how they fit into Alaska's combined totals. Here's the current BLM federal claim/site breakdown by case disposition:
| BLM Status | Records |
|---|---|
| Active | 8,715 |
| Filed | 683 |
| Under Review | 119 |
Filed and Under Review records have a pending BLM case action and shouldn't be treated as identical to a fully Active claim. Verify a specific claim's exact status through BLM MLRS, or an Alaska DNR state claim's status directly with Alaska DNR, before relying on it.
Open the free Alaska map to inspect recorded claims alongside surface-management boundaries.
Open Alaska Map Free Free account · No credit card requiredAlaska's boroughs and census areas — not counties, which Alaska doesn't have — combining current BLM federal and Alaska DNR state records for each.
| Borough / Census Area | BLM | Alaska DNR | Combined | % of Alaska Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area | 990 | 9,607 | 10,597 | 21.3% |
| Southeast Fairbanks Census Area | 159 | 7,140 | 7,299 | 14.7% |
| Fairbanks North Star Borough | 153 | 5,339 | 5,492 | 11.0% |
| Matanuska-Susitna Borough | 426 | 4,532 | 4,958 | 10.0% |
| Northwest Arctic Borough | 0 | 3,783 | 3,783 | 7.6% |
1,238 current BLM record(s) and 51 current Alaska DNR record(s) statewide couldn't be matched to a borough/census area (mostly records missing usable geometry) and aren't included in the rows above, so the percentages don't sum to exactly 100%.
Move from statewide totals to the claim locations and land context for the area you are researching.
Explore Alaska Claims Free Free account · No credit card required Compare premium map toolsAlaska is enormous, and most of it has no mapped mining claim at all. That's easy to misread as “open ground.” In practice, whether you can research, prospect or stake a specific spot in Alaska depends on land status and mineral ownership, not just the absence of a nearby claim. Four categories cover most of what you'll run into:
Federal land. The absence of a current claim doesn't by itself establish that the federal mineral estate at that location is open to location. Mineral withdrawals, acquired lands and other restrictions can apply even where no claim is currently on file.
Alaska state land. State land has its own mineral-entry system, run by Alaska DNR, separate from the federal process. State-owned ground isn't automatically open just because it isn't federal.
Withdrawn land. Alaska has an unusually complex withdrawal history. BLM notes that Alaska's remaining d-1 withdrawals, dating to the ANCSA era, continue to affect the status of public land in the state and can restrict activity like mining claims until BLM's land-use planning process completes and a specific withdrawal is revoked.
Native corporation and private land. Alaska Native corporation land is private land, not public land. Some tracts carry reserved public easements, including certain ANCSA 17(b) easements, but the easement itself doesn't make the surrounding land public. Alaska DNR is explicit that departing an applicable 17(b) easement onto Native land without the landowner's express permission is trespass.
Even once you've sorted out land status, getting there is its own question. Legal access — the right to be somewhere — doesn't guarantee physical access, like a maintained road or trail. Alaska DNR is explicit that legal access doesn't necessarily mean practical or constructed access exists. An easement can come with its own use restrictions, and crossing private or Native corporation land without permission is trespass regardless of what the map shows nearby.
This is also where Alaska's remoteness makes offline research genuinely useful rather than a nice-to-have: once you're out of cell service, you can't pull up a claim boundary or a land-status layer to double-check anything. Save the area before you leave service, not after.
Save any map area while you have cell service, then navigate current and historical BLM federal claims, Alaska DNR state claims, surface-management boundaries, and optional layers like elevation contours, roads, and creeks — with zero connectivity out in the field. Offline downloads are included on every paid plan. See plans below →
Alaska DNR's state mineral-property system isn't a state-run copy of the federal claim process — it works differently in several concrete ways worth knowing before you assume a state claim behaves like a federal one.
State mineral-property rights are their own legal framework. They're established and maintained under Alaska state law, administered by Alaska DNR's Mineral Property Management section, not under the federal General Mining Law BLM administers.
Mining claims are one of several location types. Alaska DNR's state system also includes leasehold locations and prospecting sites — distinct mineral-property mechanisms, not variations on the same instrument. Don't assume every record in Alaska's state claims data is legally identical.
Location descriptions and claim sizes differ. State claims commonly use MTRSC (Meridian, Township, Range, Section, Cell) location descriptions, and depending on the location form, an Alaska state mining claim can run roughly 40 or 160 acres.
Discovery is still required. As with a federal claim, a valid Alaska state mining claim requires an actual mineral discovery — staking ground alone doesn't establish a valid claim in either system.
Because of these differences, Staked Maps doesn't force Alaska DNR's records into BLM's claim-type categories (lode, placer, mill site, tunnel site) — see the claim-type and status sections above. If you need an authoritative answer about a specific state claim, Alaska DNR's Mineral Property Management section is the office to contact, not BLM.
A mapped claim — federal or state — establishes a possessory interest, not a blanket permit to mine however you want. Whether an activity requires separate authorization comes down to scale and disturbance, not just claim status.
For an individual prospector, the practical line usually runs between casual, low-impact activity and anything mechanized or larger in scale. On BLM land, hand tools and similar minimal-disturbance activity are generally treated as casual use; motorized equipment, larger-scale earth-moving or sustained operations usually cross into activity that needs authorization. On state land, Alaska DNR's own guidance distinguishes simple recreational activity — hand panning is the clearest example — from operations that exceed its Generally Allowed Uses guidelines and require a permit. Alaska's APMA (Application for Permits to Mine in Alaska) process is the mechanism that coordinates the exploration and mining authorizations larger activity needs, sometimes across multiple state and federal agencies at once.
Can you mine anywhere you find an Alaska claim?
No. Claim status, land ownership, access and authorization to conduct mining activity are separate questions. A valid claim doesn't answer any of the other three.
This is informational, not legal advice — the specific activity you're planning, its scale, and the exact land status of the location all affect what's required. Verify directly with BLM or Alaska DNR, depending on which system covers the ground, before you start.
Beyond claims, Staked Maps includes 11,063 documented mineral-occurrence records for Alaska, drawn from the USGS Mineral Resources Data System (MRDS). These records describe documented occurrences, prospects and mines — some are historic mine sites, some are single reported occurrences, and which label a record carries depends on what USGS's source data actually recorded there.
Treat these as research leads for further investigation, not a directory of open collecting sites. A documented occurrence means USGS has a record of material found at that location at some point — it says nothing about current land status, mineral ownership, or whether the location is open to public collecting today. Check land status and access separately, the same as you would for a claim.
Staked Maps splits Alaska's records into two broad groups below — metallic and non-metallic — and only calls out an individual material by name once it occurs often enough in the data to be a genuinely notable find, not a single-digit outlier dressed up as a ranking. If no individual material clears that bar, use the interactive Rockhound Hotspots map layer to filter and inspect records for a specific area instead.
11,008
Metallic Sites
55
Non-Metallic Sites
Alaska's mining and mineral activity isn't spread evenly across the state. These five areas have enough recorded activity and history to be worth their own dedicated research pages:
Fairbanks & Circle District — Alaska's largest historic gold-mining region by cumulative production, still home to significant current claim activity.
Nome & Seward Peninsula — historic beach and offshore placer gold country, with a mining history distinct from Alaska's interior districts.
Fortymile River & Chicken — one of Alaska's earliest gold-rush districts, still an active recreational and small-scale mining area today.
Mat-Su Valley — closer to Anchorage and more road-accessible than much of the state, with both lode and placer history.
Kenai Peninsula — road-system-accessible mining history on Alaska's southcentral coast.
Establish land management first. Determine whether you're looking at federal, Alaska state, private/Native corporation, or another land category before anything else.
Check current claim records — both systems. Review BLM federal claims and Alaska DNR state claims for the area; a blank result in one system doesn't cover the other.
Review historical activity. Closed claims and documented mineral occurrences can point toward areas worth a closer look, without answering current status on their own.
Verify with the official record. For federal claim questions, that's BLM. For Alaska state mineral-property questions, that's Alaska DNR. Staked Maps is a research tool, not the system of record for either.
Check access and restrictions. Look into withdrawals, private and Native corporation land, easements, and any other applicable land-management rules for the specific spot.
Match your planned activity to what it actually requires. Hand prospecting, motorized equipment and larger mining operations aren't legally equivalent — confirm what authorization your specific plan needs.
Save the area offline, then go. Once you're outside cell service, you can't look any of this up again — download your research area before you leave.
What it is: The federal management portal for unpatented mining claims, MLRS records, and public-domain land status in Alaska.
Use case: Verifying federal claim ownership, filing federal notices of location, paying annual maintenance fees, and submitting small-miner waivers.
Alaska DNR Division of Mining, Land and Water — Mineral Property Management
What it is: The state office administering mineral-property rights on Alaska state land, including mining claims, leasehold locations and prospecting sites.
Use case: Researching state mining claim laws, filing state location certificates, checking state land status, and applying for APMA permits.
What it is: Alaska DNR's own public land-record and mining-claim mapping tool.
Use case: Cross-checking a specific state claim, land status or land-record detail directly against Alaska DNR's authoritative system.
What it is: Alaska DNR's coordinated permitting process for placer mining exploration and operations that go beyond Generally Allowed Uses.
Use case: Determining what authorization a planned mining activity needs before you start.
What it is: Alaska DNR's guidance on ANCSA 17(b) public easements across Native corporation and other private land.
Use case: Understanding the limited role of these easements before crossing Native corporation land.
What it is: BLM's information on Alaska's remaining ANCSA-era public-land withdrawals and their effect on land status.
Use case: Checking whether withdrawn status affects a location, independent of whether a claim is mapped there.
What it is: Alaska's state geological survey, providing mineral maps, historical reports and geochemical sampling data.
Use case: Downloading geologic quadrangle maps and reviewing historical mining-district reports.
Staked Maps synchronizes two separate government data sources into one Alaska map: federal Bureau of Land Management claim records and Alaska Department of Natural Resources state claim records. It isn't a substitute for either agency's official record.
Single State unlocks all premium features for Alaska for $29.99/year.
Plans
Basic
Try Staked Maps in one state.
$0/mo
Paid plans unlock full claim details, historical claims, research layers and offline tools.
Get Started FreeLocal Miner
For prospectors who mostly work one state.
$29.99/yr
Everything in Free, plus:
Adventure Miner
For prospectors who cross nearby state lines.
$49.99/yr
Everything in Free, plus:
Pro Prospector
For serious Western prospectors.
$99.99/yr
Everything in Free, plus:
Just here to rockhound?
Rockhound Enthusiast
For nationwide rockhounding research.
$29.99/yr
Gem & crystal hunters, Midwest/East users — everything in Free, plus:
Single State, Tri-State and All-West all unlock the exact same features — nothing is pay-gated between them, they differ only in how many states you get.
Paid plans renew automatically at the monthly or annual rate you choose until you cancel. Cancel anytime and keep access through the end of your paid period. See our Terms of Use.
As of September 22, 2026, Staked Maps shows 49,752 combined current Alaska claim and site records: 9,517 current/not-closed federal records (BLM's own case disposition shows 8,715 Active; another 119 are Under Review and 683 are Filed) and 40,235 active records from Alaska DNR state claims. These database statuses are not a legal determination that an individual claim contains a valid mineral discovery.
A premium map layer of documented mineral occurrences, prospects and mines sourced from USGS MRDS and labeled by material where available. These records are research leads, not a directory of verified public collecting sites.
Yes. Staked Maps covers Alaska statewide. Dedicated research pages are currently available for Fairbanks & Circle District, Nome & Seward Peninsula, Fortymile River & Chicken, Mat-Su Valley and Kenai Peninsula, while the interactive map covers claims and surface management throughout Alaska.
Alaska has two separate systems. Federal mining claims on eligible federal land are administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Mineral-property rights on Alaska state land — including state mining claims, leasehold locations and prospecting sites — are administered separately by the Alaska Department of Natural Resources (DNR). See the Official Filing & Information Links section above for direct links to both.
From two sources: the Bureau of Land Management's MLRS records for federal claims, and Alaska DNR's state mining-claim records for state land, synced into our database on a regular schedule. Documented mineral-occurrence records come separately from the USGS Mineral Resources Data System.
Current records combine BLM federal claims that aren't marked closed with Alaska DNR state claims marked active. Historical records combine BLM's closed federal claims with Alaska DNR's closed state claims. The two agencies track this status independently of each other — see the federal/state breakdown above for the exact split.
Paid plans let you search by claim serial number and open a claim's full record details directly. Alaska doesn't have counties, so free accounts browse and pan the map by region instead.
Yes. Unlike most other states, where Staked Maps' claim data is BLM federal records only, Alaska's dataset also incorporates Alaska DNR state mining-claim records.
No. The claim-type and BLM-status breakdowns on this page describe federal BLM records only, because Alaska DNR records use a different classification system. DNR records are still included in the combined statewide current and historical totals.
No. A closed or historical claim shows past claim activity. It doesn't by itself establish current land ownership, mineral-entry status, access rights, or whether the ground can legally be claimed today.
Not automatically. Current land ownership, mineral-entry status, access and applicable land-management rules all need to be checked separately before treating a historical claim area as available.
No. Alaska Native corporation lands are private land. Some tracts carry reserved public easements, including certain ANCSA 17(b) easements, but the easement itself doesn't make the surrounding land public — leaving the easement onto Native land without permission is trespass.
Yes. Download a map area — including claim data and any other layers you've enabled — while you have cell service, then view it in the field with no connection. This is especially useful in Alaska, where large areas have no cell coverage at all.
Alaska's mining-claim landscape runs on two systems, a complicated land-status history, and country that's remote enough to make offline research genuinely necessary. Staked Maps brings BLM federal claims, Alaska DNR state claims, surface management and mineral-occurrence data into one map so you can do that research before you're standing in the field without service.
Free account · No credit card required · Opens directly to Alaska
Regulatory and editorial content last reviewed against official records · Source: BLM Alaska Mining and Minerals Program · Alaska DNR Division of Mining, Land and Water · USGS MRDS
Information hosted on Staked Maps is compiled from publicly available data streams provided by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and relevant state geographic clearinghouses. Staked Maps accepts no liability for the content of this geospatial data, or for the consequences of any real-world exploration, land entry, or staking actions taken on the basis of the information provided via this application interface.
Staked Maps makes no warranty, expressed or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, nor assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the pinpoint accuracy, reliability, completeness, latency, or programmatic utility of these geospatial data layers, or for the improper interpretation of these data grids.
These mapping layers and related graphics are visual convenience aids only; they are not legal documents and must never be used as such. The data may not be used to legally determine title, mineral ownership, valid description boundaries, jurisdictional authorities, or land restrictions in place on public or private land. Natural backcountry hazards may or may not be depicted on topographies, and land users are strictly mandated to exercise caution. Federal records are dynamic and change constantly. The end-user is exclusively responsible for validating current land classifications with the appropriate BLM office and/or Alaska DNR, depending on the land and claim system involved and managing compliance accordingly.